Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said on Sunday that multiple Supreme Court justices lied in their confirmation hearings about abortion, which is similar to the statements of Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins in the wake of the leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion.
“If a corporation put these kinds of statements in their quarterly filings, they would be seen to be purposefully misleading and deemed fraud,” Gillibrand (D-NY) said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” She added, “I think they misled the Senate with the intention of getting their confirmation vote with the intention of overruling Roe.”
Gillibrand was discussing last week’s leak of a draft opinion that showed the Supreme Court was prepared to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationally.
“Four justices in the last hearings I’ve witnessed have said that precedent matters and that precedent is the foundation of our legal system,” she said. “And so if they just feel they can just upend this precedent because they don’t like it today, well, that’s inconsistent with what they promised.”
Collins (R-ME) last week said she felt betrayed by what she saw in the draft opinion. “If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what Justice [Neal] Gorsuch and Justice [Brett] Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office,” Collins said in a statement.
Murkowski (R-AK) made a similar statement: “It was not the direction that I believed that the court would take, based on statements that have been made about Roe being settled and being precedent.”
When questioned whether ridding of the filibuster could in the future give Republicans the ability to make abortions illegal nationwide, Gillibrand said, “I don’t think the argument that Mitch McConnell will do bad things is persuasive at this point. [Those bad things] are already happening.”
On “Fox News Sunday,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said it was inappropriate for senators to push nominees on their views on specific cases before voting to confirm them.
“You can’t bargain your way into getting onto the court,” he said. “So any senator who tries to bargain with a nominee — Will you uphold the case I like or overturn the ones I don’t? — is really doing a disservice to the court.”
ARTICLE: PAUL MURDOCH
MANAGING EDITOR: CARSON CHOATE
PHOTO CREDITS: POLITICO