Politics

Pennsylvania judge rules in favor of Trump campaign in lawsuit regarding voter identification

PHOTO CREDITS: CNBC

On Thursday, a Pennsylvania judge ruled in favor of the Trump campaign, ordering that the state may not count ballots where the voters needed to provide proof of identification and failed to do so by Nov. 9.

According to state law, voters have until six days after the election (this was Nov. 9) to fix any problems regarding a lack of proof of identification. After the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that mail-in ballots could be accepted three days after Election Day, Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar submitted guidance that said proof of identification could be provided up until Nov. 12, which is six days from the ballot acceptance deadline. That guidance was issued two days before Election Day, though a judge ruled that this was unconstitutional. 

“[T]he Court concludes that Respondent Kathy Boockvar, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth, lacked statutory authority to issue the November 1, 2020, guidance to Respondents County Boards of Elections insofar as that guidance purported to change the deadline … for certain electors to verify proof of identification,” Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt said in a court order (FOX).

This was in accordance with the Trump campaign’s argument, which stated that there was no basis in the state’s law to extend the identification deadline, and that Boockvar did not have the power to unilaterally change it. Previously, the court had ordered that all ballots where voters provided proof of identification between Nov. 10 and 12 should be segregated until a ruling was issued determining what should be done with them. Leavitt ruled that those ballots shall not be counted.

This is one of several legal challenges the Trump campaign is bringing in Pennsylvania. On Friday, they were scheduled to have a hearing over thousands of ballots that they claim were improperly counted despite lacking required information, though results on this case remain unknown. Additionally, the campaign awaits an answer from the Supreme Court regarding whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court acted properly in granting the three-day extension for accepting mail-in ballots (The Spectator).

POLITICS EDITOR: CARSON CHOATE

Leave a Reply